What does that have to do with the name ?
Where is the difference, whether one calls the nick or the name ?
But then everyone knows anyway who is meant - or do I understand in the whole story what wrong ?
As yoshiHG says: something like that you clarify directly. One does not make that publicly with denomination of the clear name. That simply does not belong. We have here Nicks to remain anonymous.
This post has been automatically translated.
The clear name is visible in the imprint of the website, so no secrets are revealed here. Please all take a deep breath and join hands.
This post has been automatically translated.
As yoshiHG says: you clarify something like that directly. You don't do that publicly with naming the real name. That is simply not appropriate. We have here Nicks to remain anonymous.
My ok to the story with the real name.
To the direct clarify I have a different opinion. one can post also halt times its negative experience here - the positive is just as permitted.
And whether then the one or the other experience corresponds to the truth, no one can verify here by the post anyway.
This post has been automatically translated.
I may quote myself.
Measurement technology does not lie. If someone claims that his radio modules work and I have considerable doubts about this from a measurement point of view, but the customer sticks to his statement when asked, then I take the liberty of rejecting the order.
Based on the measured values, I had considerable doubts that the radio modules were still working. I therefore rejected the order.
At no time did I say that anyone was lying, nor was it my intention. If necessary, I ask to read my contribution again exactly and completely. If the contribution was misleading, I apologize.
I had written to them that it would be possible for key 1 to still be recognized due to the measured values and that key 2 was so far off from the measured values that it was unlikely for me that it would still be recognized.
As you can see very well here, I can be wrong.
I would also like to point out at this point that there are reasons why I have become very cautious in the meantime and prefer to reject once more than to accept when I have doubts. That was, when I started with the topic electronics repairs, still completely different. There are always two sides.
This post has been automatically translated.
I do not know now where the problem should be? Member DLR has written that it could be that the keys are recognized, although he considers it unlikely. In this respect, he prefers to reject the order. That's it. I think it's great. My keys don't eat batteries anymore, since they were with him. I think that's great, too. I can recommend him without reservation, despite or even because of the experiences described here!
This post has been automatically translated.
I think that's through now.
Closer to the topic would be better.
MUV17 
This post has been automatically translated.
This morning I was going to my Porsche screwdriver and order keys and fortunately tested the non-functioning keys again.
Then just buy two new upper parts for both keys with 3 buttons:
Part No.: 99663735500 costs 16.02 EUR incl. VAT in the PZ. 
This post has been automatically translated.
This morning I was going to my Porsche screwdriver and order keys and fortunately tested the non-functioning keys again.
Then just buy two new upper parts for both keys with 3 buttons:
Part No.: 99663735500 costs 16.02 EUR incl. VAT in the PZ.
I do!
This post has been automatically translated.
